Rupert Murdoch's 9/11 conspiracy

Tony Blair is considering taking a plum job with media tycoon Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., it has been reported. Well, even if he doesn't, Blair's coziness with Murdoch is no secret.

The Murdoch-Blair alliance should be seen in light of Murdoch's role as a post-9/11 conspirator whose task was to lay down a propaganda barrage insinuating that Saddam Hussein had a hand in the 9/11 attacks.

A poll taken a while back showed that a high percentage of Americans who got most of their news from Fox News were convinced of Hussein's complicity in 9/11. The percentage of those so misinformed was substantially higher than for those whose main news source was not Fox.
This statistic demonstrates that Murdoch was part of a conspiracy to exploit 9/11 as a reason for war against Iraq. Bush, Cheney, Rice, Tenet, Powell, Rumsfeld and others were Murdoch's co-conspirators, some more eager than others.

The propaganda war of innuendo included the weapons of mass destruction charge, whereby the impression was created that ridding the world of Hussein would also take weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of someone who, by implication, was responsible for 9/11 the post-9/11 anthrax attacks.

Had not the Baltimore Sun disclosed the fact that the anthrax strain derived from the Pentagon, it seems probable that the biowar attacks would have been used even more obviously to try to link Hussein, who was publicly suspected of holding such weapons, to 9/11.

Now Blair avoided making too much of a Saddam-9/11 link. But he was certainly highly interested in sticking with the crew that wanted war with Iraq which, as we now know, were the neocons and militant zionists (note: I am breaking the U.S. media convention of declining to use the descriptive word "zionist" even for those who refer to themselves as zionists).

And one of the world's biggest propagandists for zionism is Rupert Murdoch, who wins high praise from militant Jews backing a "strong Israel" (see my article Fox News: trumpet of Israel's hard right at http://www.angelfire.com/az3/nfold/rupert.html) He is also active in media affairs with the noted zionist N.M. Rothschild, whom he has known since at the least the 1960s.

Of course, as I have said previously, not only did the Sharon government have something to gain from the 9/11 attacks, so did the Putin government, which wanted unreserved U.S. support for its campaign against the Islamic Chechnyan separatists.

My basic point is that the statistical result is very strong evidence of a media-government conspiracy to exploit 9/11. Now, if such people are provably part of a post-9/11 conspiracy, is it unreasonable to think that there was a pre-9/11 conspiracy, that it was an inside job?